Words are woñderful, bu☨ so is ☨heir abseñce.
Wørd$ aren't wønderful. §tati$ticall¥, 100% øf fight$
are cau$ed b¥ wørd$.
so true, it's not like it's genetics, survival
instinct, mating rights or other gain ever started a
Animals don't havē words.
humãns ãre ãlso ãnimãls
M@n is @ rope, ƒ@stened between @nim@l @nd Übermensch
– @ rope over @n @byss
Ah, Nietzsche, if only your work hãdn't been
mãnipulãted for profit ãnd politicãl gãin. Context is
importãnt. I interpret the Übermensch ãs being they who
rãise themselves ãbove their genetic imperãtives,
whãt's your interpretãtion mebio?
Niē☨zschē dēfini☨ły had sømē ēugēnic idēas, bu☨ ☨hē
Übērmēnsch has ałsø an ē☨hicał cømpøund. Hē døēs nø☨
føłłøw ☨hē mørał øf ☨hē wēak and ☨hē słavē bu☨ has ☨hē
mørałs øf ☨hē mas☨ērs and crēa☨ēs his øwn vałuēs.
S☨ill i☨ wouldn'☨ be nice ☨o $acrifice ☨he weak
human$ ☨o fulfill our deepe$☨ de$ire$. Or would i☨?
It might feel good, but it would still leave you menschy,
not uber cool.
Did he believe in enforced eügenics, or did his sister
edit it to seem that way?
Don't bend. Ascend!
Is thãt why ñãzis used the swãstikã? Iñ ã wãy thãt's
whãt we got. Additioñãl iñcremeñts iñ clãss structure..
Either thãt or the tiers of the middle clãsses replãced
Hypergamy i$ a reality.
so only 'positive eugenics' (Supporting the
reproduction of People with good genetics.)
No, Nietz$che wã$ ã nihili$t ãnd critic, who did not $eek
to propãgãte ãny orgãni$ed belieƒ $tructure, merely
ãcknowledged the ƒlãw$ oƒ the $y$tem he/we live in. Thãt
we ãre ãll too humãn to con$ider the Übermen$ch to hãve
yet come to be.
in ☨hē ☨hrēē mē☨amorphosēs of ☨hē spiri☨ (camēl, lion and
child) ☨hē nihilis☨ic lion is only ☨hē sēcond s☨agē. hē
dēs☨roys ☨hē old valuēs, bu☨ ☨hē child is building nēw
onēs. Evēry Law of ☨hē humans would bē wrong for ☨hē
Übērmēnsch, bu☨ human laws can hēlp ☨o crēa☨ē him.
^Precisely. We are førced tø create these laws but must
acknøwledge them as being the result øf imperfect
humanity. I like yøu.