Words are wonderful, but so is their absence.
Words aren't wonderful. Statistically, 100% of fights
are caused by words.
so true, it's not like it's genetics, survival
instinct, mating rights or other gain ever started a
Animals don't have words.
hümans are ałso animałs
Man is a rope, fastened between animal and Übermensch
– a rope over an abyss
Ah, Nietzsche, if only your work hadn't been
manipulated for profit and political gain. Context is
important. I interpret the Übermensch as being they who
raise themselves above their genetic imperatives,
what's your interpretation mebio?
Nietzsche deƒinitly had søme eugenic ideas, but the
Übermensch has alsø an ethical cømpøund. He døes nøt
ƒølløw the møral øƒ the weak and the slave but has the
mørals øƒ the masters and creates his øwn values.
Still it wouldn't be nice to sacrifice the weak
humans to fulfill our deepest desires. Or would it?
įt might fēēl good, but it would still lēavē you mēnschy,
not ubēr cool.
Did he believe in enførced eugenics, ør did his sister
edit it tø seem that way?
Don't bend. Ascend!
Is that why nazis used the swastika? In a way that's
what we got. Additional increments in class structure..
Either that or the tiers of the middle classes replaced
Hypergamy is a reality.
so onl¥ 'positive eugenics' (§upporting the
reproduction of People with good genetics.)
No, Nietz$che wa$ a nihili$t and critic, who did not $eek
to propagate any organi$ed belief $tructure, merely
acknowledged the flaw$ of the $y$tem he/we live in. That
we are all too human to con$ider the Übermen$ch to have
yet come to be.
in the three metamorphoses of the spirit (camel, lion and
child) the nihilistic lion is only the second stage. he
destroys the old values, but the child is building new
ones. 3very Law of the humans would be wrong for the
Übermensch, but human laws can help to create him.
^Preci$ely. We @re førced tø cre@te the$e l@w$ but mu$t
@cknøwledge them @$ being the re$ult øf imperfect
hum@nity. I like yøu.