Word$ are wonderful, but $o i$ their ab$ence.
Words aren't wonderfül. Statistically, 100% of fights
are caüsed by words.
so true, it's not like it's genetics, survival
instinct, mating rights or other gain ever started a
Animals don'☨ have words.
humans are also animals
Man is a ropē, fastēnēd bētwēēn animal and Übērmēnsch
– a ropē ovēr an ab¥ss
Ah, Nie☨zsche, if only your work hadn'☨ been
manipula☨ed for profi☨ and poli☨ical gain. Con☨ex☨ is
impor☨an☨. I in☨erpre☨ ☨he Übermensch as being ☨hey who
raise ☨hemselves above ☨heir gene☨ic impera☨ives,
wha☨'s your in☨erpre☨a☨ion mebio?
Nietzsche definitly hãd søme eugenic ideãs, but the
Übermensch hãs ãlsø ãn ethicãl cømpøund. He døes nøt
følløw the mørãl øf the weãk ãnd the slãve but hãs the
mørãls øf the mãsters ãnd creãtes his øwn vãlues.
Still it wouldn't be nice to sacrifice the weak
humans to fulfill our deepest desires. Ωr would it?
It might feel gøød, but it wøuld still leave yøu menschy,
nøt uber cøøl.
Did he believe in enførced eugenics, ør did his sister
edit it tø seem th@t w@y?
Don't bend. Ascend!
Is ☨ha☨ why nazis used ☨he swas☨ika? In a way ☨ha☨'s
wha☨ we go☨. Addi☨ional incremen☨s in class s☨ruc☨ure..
Ei☨her ☨ha☨ or ☨he ☨iers of ☨he middle classes replaced
Hypērgãmy i$ ã rēãlity.
so only 'positive eugenics' (Supporting the
reproduction of People with good genetics.)
No, Nietzsche was a nihilist and critic, who did not seek
to propagate any organised belief structure, merely
acknowledged the flaws of the system he/we live in. That
we are all too human to consider the Übermensch to have
yet come to be.
in the three metamorphoses of the spirit (camel, lion and
child) the nihilistic lion is only the second stage. he
destroys the old values, but the child is building new
ones. Every Law of the humans would be wrong for the
Übermensch, but human laws can help to create him.
^Precisel¥. We are forced to create these laws but must
acknowledge them as being the result of imperfect
humanit¥. I like ¥ou.