Words are wonderful, but so is their absence.
Words arēn't wondērful. Statistically, 100% of fights
arē causēd by words.
so true, it's not like it's genetics, survival
instinct, mating rights or other gain ever started a
Animals don't havē words.
humans are also animals
Man is a røpe, fastened between animal and Übermensch
– a røpe øver an abyss
Ah, Nietzsche, if ønly yøur wørk hadn't been
manipulated før prøfit and pølitical gain. Cøntext is
impørtant. I interpret the Übermensch as being they whø
raise themselves abøve their genetic imperatives,
what's yøur interpretatiøn mebiø?
Nietzsche definitly had some eugenic ideas, but the
Übermensch has also an ethical compound. He does not
follow the moral of the weak and the slave but has the
morals of the masters and creates his own values.
Still it wouldn't be nice to sacrifice the weak
humans to fulfill our deepest desires. Or would it?
įt might feel good, but it would still leave you menschy,
not uber cool.
Did he believe in enforced eugenics, or did his sister
edit it to seem th@t w@y?
Don't bend. Ascend!
Is th@t why n@zis used the sw@stik@? In @ w@y th@t's
wh@t we got. Addition@l increments in cl@ss structure..
Either th@t or the tiers of the middle cl@sses repl@ced
Hypergãmy is ã reãlity.
so only 'positivē ēugēnics' (Supporting thē
rēproduction of Pēoplē with good gēnētics.)
No, Nietzsche was a nihilist and critic, who did not seek
to propagate an¥ organised belief structure, merel¥
acknowledged the flaws of the s¥stem he/we live in. That
we are all too human to consider the Übermensch to have
¥et come to be.
in the three metamorpho$e$ of the $pirit (camel, lion and
child) the nihili$tic lion i$ only the $econd $tage. he
de$troy$ the old value$, but the child i$ building new
one$. Every Law of the human$ would be wrong for the
Übermen$ch, but human law$ can help to create him.
^Precisely. We ãre ƒorced to creãte these lãws but must
ãcknowledge them ãs being the result oƒ imperƒect
humãnity. I like you.